Tuesday, December 11, 2018

MEANING,PURPOSE AND BASES OF TRAINING EVALUATION


Ø  EVALUATION OF TRAINGING PROGRAMME

Ø  TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT
Ø  QUESTIONS
Ø  Q1WHAT ARE VARIOUS PURPOSES AND USES OF TRAINING EVALUATION?
Ø  Q2TRAINING PROGRAMMES CAN BE EVALUATED ON THE BASIS OF SEVERAL FACTORS? DESCRIBE THESE FACTORS IN DETAIL.?
Ø  ANSWER:
Ø  MEANING AND DEFINITION OF TRAINING EVALUATION
Ø  THE PROCESS OF EXAMINING A TRAINING PROGRAM IS CALLED TRAINING EVALUATION. IT CHECKS WHETHER THE TRAINING HAS HAD THE DESIRE EFFECT. TRAINING EVALUATION ENSURES WHETHER THE CANDIDATES ARE ABLE TO IMPLEMENT THEIR LEARNING IN THEIR RESPECTIVE WORKPLACE OR TO THE REGULAR WORK ROUTINES.

 


Ø  ACCORDING TO RAAB ET AL “ TRAINING EVALUATION IS A SYSTEMATIC PROCESS OF COLLECTING INFORMATION FOR AND ABOUT TRAINING ACTIVITY WHICH CAN THEN BE USED FOR GUIDING DECSION MAKING AND FOR ASSESSING THE RELEVENCE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF VARIOUS TRAINING COMPONENTS.
Ø  PURPOSE
I.        TO DETERMINE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRAINING PROGRAMME
II.        TO IDENTIFY THR STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS IN THE TRAINING PROCESS
III.        TO COMPARE THE COST TO THE BENEFITS OF A TRAINING PROGRAMME
IV.        TO TEST THE CLARITY,VALIDITY OF THE TOOLS OF TRAINING PROGRAMME
V.        TO ASSESS THE POSSIBILITY OF INCLUSION OF PROSPECTIVE PARTICIPANT
VI.        TO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO DEVELOP MARKETING STRATEGY FOR FUTURE PROGRAMMES
VII.        TO IDENTIFY HOW IT BENEFITS THE PARTICIPANTS
VIII.        REINFORCE THE LEARNING
IX.        TO ESTABLISH A DATA BASE THAT CAN ASSIST MGMT IN MAKING DECISIONS
Ø  NEED  AND SIGNIFICANCE OF TRAINING EVALUATION
1.     TO FIND OUT WHERE DESIRED EXPECTATION ARE AND ARE NOT BEING MET
2.     TO MAKE IT MORE CONDUCIVE FOR LEARNING
3.     TO KNOW THE STRENGTH AND WEAKNESS OF THE CURRENT COURSE AND SUITABLY REVISE AND REDEFINE
4.     TO IDENTIFY THE BARRIERS AND CONSTRAINTS AND HOW TO REDUCE IT
5.     TO ANALYSE IT TERMS OF COST AND BENEFIT
6.     TO GET COMMITMENT
7.     TO GIVE FEED BACK TO INSTRUCTOR AND COURSE DEVELOPER
8.     TO JUSTIFY AND INCREASE IN THE BUDGET
9.     TO MANAGE THE TRAINING FUNCTION MORE PROFESSIONALLY
    PRINCIPLES
A.    CLARITY ABOUT THE GOALS AND PURPOSES OF EVALUATION
B.    CONTINUOUS
C.    SPECIFIC
D.    BASED ON OBJECTIVE METHODS AND STANDARDS
E.     TRIED AND TESTED METHODS TO IMPART TRAINING
F.     REALISTIC TARGET DATES
G.   MUST BE VERIFIABLE
Ø  BASES OF TRAINING EVALUATION
Ø  CAN BE EVALUATED ON THE BASIS OF THE FOLLOWING FACTORS:-
v  PRODUCTION FACTORS:-
i.        IN OPERATIVE TRAINING ,WORTH OF IT MEASURED BY CHANGE IN PRODUCTIVITY
ii.        WASTAGE  RATE
iii.        DECREASE IN UNIT  RATE AND UNIT COST OF PRODUCTION
iv.        REDUCTION IN MACHINE SETTING TIME
v  GENERAL OBSERVATION
i.        THE IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR IS THE GOOD JUDGE
ii.        CHANGE IN THE SKILL AND METHODOLOGY OF THE SUBORDINATES
´  BASES OF TRAINING EVALUATION
v  HUMAN RESOURCE FACTORS:-ON THE BASIS OF EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION WHICH IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FACTORS:
          DECREASE IN:
  1. EMPLOYEE TURNOVER
  2. ABSENTEEISM
  3. NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS
  4. NUMBER OF DISCHARGE OR DISMISSAL
  5. INCREASE IN EMPLOYEE MORALE

v  PERFORMANCE TEST:-
I.        TO SEE BEFORE AND AFTER RESULT
II.        PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BEFORE AND AFTER
v  COST-VALUE RELATIONSHIP:-
I.        THE COST OF TRAINING
II.        CONTRIBUTION MEASURED IN CREASE IN PRODUCTIVITY,DECREASE IN WASTAGE,BREAKAGE AND MINIMIZATION OF TIME REQUIREMENT ETC
Ø  PROCESS OF TRAINING EVALUATION
q  FOCUS:-
            GOAL AND SCOPE FOR THE EVALUATION EFFORT
            COMMITMENT TO PROVIDE RESOURCES FOR MEASURING EVALUATION

q  PLANNING:-
          BLUE PRINT FOR EVALUATION
          SPECIFIES THE LEVEL,SOURCES OF DATA
          METHODS FOR COLLECTION
          TIME LIMIT

´  PROCESS OF TRAINING EVALUATION
q  IMPLEMENT:-
            COLLECTING
            TABULATING
            ANALYZING
            REPORTING
q  EVALUATE EVALUATION:-
          COMPARISON OF COST-BENEFIT
          ENHANCE AND IMPROVE THE EFFECTIVENESS
          MEASURE THE QUALITY OF THE EVALUATION TOOLS
          TO MEASURE THE QUALITY OF DATA SUPPLIED FOR DECISION MAKING



No comments:

Post a Comment